(a) INF Treaty as an Arms Control Measure
Introduction
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was a landmark arms control agreement signed between the United States and the Soviet Union in 1987 to reduce the risk of nuclear war. It specifically targeted intermediate-range and short-range ballistic and cruise missiles to enhance global security.
This short note explores the importance of the INF Treaty, its key provisions, its impact on global security, and the reasons for its eventual collapse.
1. Background and Purpose of the INF Treaty
- Signed on December 8, 1987, by U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev.
- Aimed at eliminating nuclear and conventional missiles with a range of 500–5,500 km.
- The treaty was designed to reduce Cold War tensions and prevent a potential nuclear confrontation in Europe.
2. Key Provisions of the INF Treaty
- Elimination of Land-Based Missiles: Required both the U.S. and USSR to destroy all intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles.
- Verification Measures: Included on-site inspections, satellite surveillance, and data-sharing to ensure compliance.
- Complete Disarmament of Certain Weapon Systems: Both sides agreed to completely remove INF-class weapons rather than just limiting their production.
3. Impact of the INF Treaty
- Over 2,600 Missiles Destroyed: By 1991, both countries had eliminated a total of 2,692 missiles.
- Reduced Cold War Tensions: Marked a major step in U.S.-Soviet relations, paving the way for future nuclear arms reduction agreements.
- Improved European Security: Reduced the threat of a nuclear standoff in Europe, as most of the missiles were stationed in NATO and Warsaw Pact countries.
4. Collapse of the INF Treaty
- In 2019, the U.S. officially withdrew from the treaty, citing Russian violations (allegations that Russia developed banned missile systems like the 9M729).
- Russia denied the accusations but later suspended its participation as well.
- The collapse of the INF Treaty raised fears of a renewed arms race, particularly in Europe and Asia.
(b) Nuclear Deterrence
Introduction
Nuclear deterrence is a military strategy that prevents war by threatening nuclear retaliation. The idea is based on the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), where nuclear-armed nations avoid conflict because any attack would result in catastrophic retaliation.
This short note explores the principles of nuclear deterrence, its advantages, risks, and modern challenges.
1. Principles of Nuclear Deterrence
- Credibility: A country must demonstrate its willingness to use nuclear weapons if attacked.
- Second-Strike Capability: Even if a nation is hit by a nuclear attack, it must have the ability to launch a devastating counterattack.
- Psychological Impact: The goal is not to use nuclear weapons but to prevent war by creating fear of total destruction.
2. Types of Nuclear Deterrence
A. Direct Deterrence
- Used to prevent an attack on a nation itself.
- Example: The U.S. and Russia maintain nuclear arsenals to deter attacks on their own territories.
B. Extended Deterrence
- A country promises to protect its allies with nuclear weapons.
- Example: The U.S. nuclear umbrella over NATO deters attacks on European allies.
3. Advantages of Nuclear Deterrence
- Prevents Major Wars: No nuclear-armed country has ever engaged in a full-scale war with another nuclear power.
- Maintains Strategic Balance: Ensures that no one country becomes too powerful without facing consequences.
- Encourages Diplomacy: Nuclear deterrence forces countries to engage in diplomatic negotiations instead of military conflicts.
4. Risks and Challenges of Nuclear Deterrence
A. Risk of Accidental War
- Miscalculations, false alarms, or technical errors could lead to a catastrophic nuclear exchange.
- Example: In 1983, a Soviet early-warning system falsely detected a U.S. nuclear attack, nearly triggering World War III.
B. Nuclear Proliferation
- More countries developing nuclear weapons increases the risk of global instability.
- Example: The North Korean nuclear program has heightened tensions in Asia.
C. Terrorist Threats
- If nuclear materials fall into the hands of terrorist organizations, deterrence would not work, as terrorists are not a conventional state.
5. Future of Nuclear Deterrence
- Countries are exploring missile defense systems to counter threats (e.g., the U.S. THAAD system).
- Diplomatic efforts like arms control treaties (e.g., New START between the U.S. and Russia) aim to prevent nuclear escalation.
- The concept of minimum deterrence is gaining attention, where nations keep only the smallest necessary nuclear stockpile.
Conclusion
The INF Treaty was a major achievement in arms control, reducing nuclear threats during the Cold War. However, its collapse in 2019 has created concerns about a new arms race.
Nuclear deterrence has played a key role in preventing wars between nuclear-armed states, but it comes with risks of accidental war, proliferation, and terrorist threats. In the modern era, diplomatic efforts and arms control agreements remain essential to maintaining global security.
For More Political Science Assignment Questions, Visit:
For more political science assignment questions visit
To search other questions, visit
To see the assignment questions, visit