a) Dalit Panther Movement
Introduction
The Dalit Panther Movement was a radical Dalit rights movement that emerged in Maharashtra in 1972. Inspired by the Black Panther Movement in the USA, it aimed to fight caste oppression, untouchability, and social injustice against Dalits. The movement became a significant force in the 1970s, advocating for Dalit dignity, self-respect, and political rights.
Origins and Objectives of the Dalit Panther Movement
- Formed by Namdeo Dhasal, J.V. Pawar, and Raja Dhale, inspired by B.R. Ambedkar’s ideas.
- It rejected caste hierarchy and Hindu orthodoxy, demanding equal rights for Dalits.
- Criticized mainstream political parties for failing to uplift Dalits.
Key Features and Activities of the Movement
1. Fight Against Atrocities
- Protested violence against Dalits, including rape, killings, and caste discrimination.
- Highlighted the failure of laws like the Untouchability Offenses Act (1955) in protecting Dalits.
2. Demand for Implementation of the Constitution
- Emphasized B.R. Ambedkar’s vision of social equality and justice.
- Demanded strict implementation of reservation policies and land reforms.
3. Militant and Radical Approach
- Unlike moderate Dalit groups, the Panthers openly confronted caste oppression through aggressive protests.
- Used literature, poetry, and street protests to mobilize Dalit youth.
4. Political and Social Impact
- Exposed police brutality and caste-based violence, putting Dalit issues in national politics.
- Inspired later Dalit movements and political parties like the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).
Decline of the Dalit Panther Movement
- Internal ideological differences weakened the movement.
- Many leaders joined mainstream politics, diluting its radical stance.
- By the late 1970s, the movement lost its influence but left a lasting impact on Dalit politics.
Conclusion
The Dalit Panther Movement redefined Dalit activism by adopting a radical and assertive approach. Though it declined over time, it laid the foundation for modern Dalit political movements, ensuring that caste oppression remains a key issue in Indian democracy.
9. b) Marxian Frameworks for Studying State Politics
Introduction
Marxism provides a class-based approach to understanding state politics. Karl Marx’s theory of the state argues that the state is not neutral but serves the interests of the ruling capitalist class. Marxist scholars study how economic power shapes political institutions, laws, and governance.
Key Marxist Perspectives on State Politics
1. The State as an Instrument of the Bourgeoisie
- Marxists argue that the state represents the interests of the ruling capitalist class.
- Laws and policies are designed to protect private property and capital accumulation.
- Example: Corporate influence in Indian politics through lobbying and electoral funding.
2. Class Struggle and Political Power
- Politics is seen as a conflict between the ruling (bourgeoisie) and working class (proletariat).
- The state suppresses worker uprisings through police and military forces.
- Example: Labor law amendments favoring industrialists over workers.
3. The State and Ideology (Gramscian Approach)
- Antonio Gramsci introduced the concept of hegemony, where the ruling class controls the masses through ideology rather than force.
- Schools, media, and religion legitimize capitalist rule, making exploitation seem natural.
4. The Crisis of the Capitalist State
- Marxists believe that capitalism leads to economic crises, forcing the state to intervene through welfare schemes to prevent revolts.
- Example: Government programs like MNREGA and food subsidies aim to reduce class tensions.
5. The Withering Away of the State (Communist Perspective)
- Marxists argue that in a classless society, the state will become unnecessary and disappear.
- This is the ultimate goal of socialism and communism.
Criticism of the Marxist Approach
- Overemphasis on class: Ignores other factors like caste, religion, and identity politics.
- Failure of communist states: Many Marxist-inspired governments became authoritarian.
- Adaptability of capitalism: The state often reforms itself to address inequality without collapsing.
Conclusion
The Marxist framework remains relevant in understanding economic power, corporate influence, and class struggle in politics. However, modern states are more complex, requiring a broader approach beyond pure economic determinism.
For more political science assignment questions visit: IGNOU MA Political Science Assignments
To search other questions, visit: IGNOU Solved Assignments
To see the assignment questions, visit: IGNOU Official Assignment PDF