Site icon IGNOU CORNER

Consider the following Lagrange problem: Maximise f(u,v) = u + 3v subject to g(u,v) = u² + av² = 10. Use the envelope theorem… [Full question continued]

Part a) Lagrange Problem and Envelope Theorem

Given:

Step 1: Lagrangian Function

L(u, v, λ) = u + 3v + λ(10 − u² − av²)

Step 2: First-Order Conditions

1/(2u) = 3/(2av)v = 3au

Step 3: Plug into Constraint

u² + a(3au)² = 10

u² + 9a²u² = 10 → u²(1 + 9a²) = 10

u² = 10 / (1 + 9a²)u = √[10 / (1 + 9a²)]

Step 4: Calculate f*(a)

v = 3au → f(u,v) = u + 3v = u + 3(3au) = u(1 + 9a)

So, f*(a) = √[10 / (1 + 9a²)] * (1 + 9a)

Step 5: Estimate f*(1.01)

Envelope Theorem Check:

Envelope Theorem tells us:

df*/da = −λ * ∂g/∂a = −λ * v²

Since v = 3au and u = √[10 / (1 + 9a²)], this can be verified by substitution if exact change is required.

Part b) Maximize f(u;a) = −u² + 2au + 4a

Given:

Step 1: First Order Condition

∂f/∂u = −2u + 2a = 0 → u = a

Step 2: Plug back into f(u; a)

f(a; a) = −a² + 2a² + 4a = a² + 4a

Thus, optimal value of function:

f* = a² + 4a

Implications:

Conclusion

We solved two Lagrange problems — one using Envelope Theorem to estimate the optimal value with a slight change in parameter a, and the second by directly optimizing a function with respect to u. These techniques are common in economic optimization and sensitivity analysis. Envelope Theorem helps simplify comparative statics when a constraint changes slightly, while direct optimization gives closed-form solutions under known conditions.

Exit mobile version