Site icon IGNOU CORNER

Analyse aims of education as advocated by Rabindranath Tagore, Mahatma Gandhi, and Sri Aurobindo Ghose. Find out similarities and differences in their aims of education.

Introduction

Great Indian thinkers like Rabindranath Tagore, Mahatma Gandhi, and Sri Aurobindo Ghose have significantly influenced the philosophy of education in India. Each of them developed unique views on the purpose and aim of education based on their life experiences, values, and visions for society. This article explores their educational aims and compares their similarities and differences in a simple and easy-to-understand way.

Rabindranath Tagore’s Aims of Education

Rabindranath Tagore believed that education should be natural, joyful, and connected with life. He opposed rigid classroom systems and rote learning. His main educational aims were:

Tagore founded Visva-Bharati University at Santiniketan to implement these ideas in real life.

Mahatma Gandhi’s Aims of Education

Mahatma Gandhi’s approach to education was called Nai Talim or Basic Education. He wanted education to be simple, practical, and rooted in Indian culture. His key aims of education were:

Gandhi felt that education should not create a divide between manual and mental labor. Everyone should contribute to society equally.

Sri Aurobindo Ghose’s Aims of Education

Sri Aurobindo saw education as a way to help each person grow spiritually and realize their full potential. His aims of education were based on his philosophy of Integral Education. They include:

Sri Aurobindo’s partner, The Mother, helped put his educational ideas into practice through institutions like the Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education.

Similarities in Their Educational Aims

Differences in Their Educational Aims

Conclusion

Though Tagore, Gandhi, and Aurobindo had different approaches to education, they all shared a vision of education that goes beyond exams and degrees. Their ideas continue to inspire educators today. They remind us that true education is not just about jobs or marks but about developing a complete human being—capable, creative, moral, and peaceful.

Exit mobile version