Site icon IGNOU CORNER

State, obligation and civil disobedience

Introduction

Mahatma Gandhi had a deep and thoughtful understanding of the state, the obligations of citizens, and the moral justification for civil disobedience. He saw the state as a necessary institution but warned that when it becomes unjust or oppressive, citizens have both the right and the duty to resist it peacefully. Gandhi’s principles on these issues helped shape modern ideas about democracy, justice, and non-violent protest.

The State in Gandhian Thought

Gandhi was not completely against the idea of a state, but he believed that the state often becomes a tool for violence, exploitation, and centralization of power. He feared that an all-powerful state would reduce individuals to mere machines. He said:

“The State represents violence in a concentrated and organized form.”

He advocated for a state that:

Citizen’s Obligation

Gandhi believed that every citizen has the duty to:

However, when laws go against conscience and moral truth, Gandhi argued that it is not just a right, but a moral obligation to oppose them.

Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience is the non-violent refusal to obey unjust laws. Gandhi made this a central part of his political strategy. Important points include:

Through civil disobedience, Gandhi wanted to awaken the moral conscience of the rulers and create public awareness of injustice.

Examples

Relevance Today

Gandhi’s ideas on civil disobedience continue to inspire movements across the world:

Conclusion

In conclusion, Gandhi believed that the state must serve justice and humanity. When it fails, citizens have the moral right to resist through non-violent civil disobedience. This idea upholds democracy, protects human dignity, and creates a more just world. Gandhi’s approach remains a timeless guide for confronting injustice without hatred or violence.

Exit mobile version