6. a) New Trends of Federalism in Australia
Introduction
Australia follows a federal system of government, where power is divided between the Commonwealth (federal) government, six states, and two territories. Over time, Australia’s federalism has evolved due to economic, political, and social changes, leading to new trends such as cooperative federalism, fiscal reforms, and digital governance.
These new trends aim to enhance coordination between federal and state governments, improve service delivery, and ensure efficient governance in the 21st century.
Key Trends in Australian Federalism
1. Cooperative Federalism and National Cabinet
- In 2020, the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) was replaced by the National Cabinet, increasing cooperation between federal and state governments.
- The National Cabinet was particularly effective in coordinating COVID-19 responses, vaccine rollouts, and economic recovery plans.
- It has helped streamline infrastructure projects, energy policies, and disaster management.
2. Fiscal Federalism and GST Revenue Sharing Reforms
- Australia’s federal government collects most taxes and distributes funds to states.
- New fiscal reforms aim to reduce financial dependency on federal grants, allowing states more control over healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
- The Goods and Services Tax (GST) distribution formula was modified to ensure fairer funding for all states.
3. Digital Governance and Smart Federalism
- Digitalization has improved coordination between federal and state governments.
- Programs like MyGov and digital health records allow for better service delivery across different levels of government.
- Smart city initiatives use technology to improve urban planning and public transportation.
4. Environmental Federalism and Climate Action
- States like Victoria and New South Wales have introduced their own climate action policies, often leading the way ahead of federal initiatives.
- Increasing cooperation on renewable energy projects, carbon reduction targets, and water resource management reflects a new trend in environmental federalism.
Challenges in Federalism
❌ Conflicts over funding allocation – States demand greater financial independence.
❌ Unequal policy implementation – Different states have different laws on health, transport, and education.
❌ Political tensions between federal and state governments, especially when different political parties hold power.
Conclusion
New trends in Australian federalism focus on cooperation, financial reforms, digital transformation, and environmental governance. By enhancing collaboration between federal and state governments, Australia aims to create a more efficient, transparent, and citizen-focused governance system.
6. b) Senate-Executive Relations in Australia
Introduction
The Australian Senate is the upper house of Parliament, responsible for reviewing laws, scrutinizing government actions, and representing states. Its relationship with the executive branch (Prime Minister and Cabinet) is essential in maintaining a democratic balance of power.
While the executive governs, the Senate acts as a check on government decisions, ensuring that policies are debated, amended, or rejected when necessary. However, conflicts between the Senate and the executive have often led to political deadlocks and constitutional crises.
Key Aspects of Senate-Executive Relations
1. Legislative Oversight and Lawmaking
- The Senate reviews and amends legislation proposed by the House of Representatives.
- The executive (government ministers) must justify their policies before the Senate.
- The Senate can block laws, making it harder for the executive to pass controversial policies.
2. Power of Senate Committees
- The Senate has powerful committees that investigate government actions, budget spending, and policy decisions.
- These committees can summon ministers, demand documents, and hold inquiries into corruption or policy failures.
- Example: The Senate’s role in scrutinizing COVID-19 policies and vaccine procurement.
3. Political Conflicts and Senate Gridlock
- If the Senate rejects a government’s key policies, it can lead to a political crisis.
- Example: The 1975 Constitutional Crisis, where the Senate blocked the budget, led to the dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam.
- Governments without a Senate majority must negotiate with smaller parties and independents to pass legislation.
Challenges in Senate-Executive Relations
❌ Legislative deadlocks – The Senate often blocks government bills, leading to delays.
❌ Power struggles between the Prime Minister and the Senate over national policies.
❌ Overuse of political negotiations – The executive must make deals with minor parties to pass laws.
Conclusion
Senate-executive relations are critical to Australia’s democracy, ensuring government accountability and balanced decision-making. While the Senate acts as a check on executive power, conflicts can lead to policy delays and constitutional crises, requiring greater cooperation between both branches.
For more political science assignment questions visit: IGNOU MA Political Science Assignments
To search other questions, visit: IGNOU Solved Assignments
To see the assignment questions, visit: IGNOU Official Assignment PDF