Introduction
Social movements emerge due to grievances, collective action, and the availability of resources. Two of the most influential theories explaining the rise of social movements are:
- Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) – Focuses on the availability and management of resources that enable collective action.
- Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT) – Suggests that movements arise when people feel deprived compared to others in society.
Both theories provide different perspectives on how and why social movements develop. While RMT highlights the role of leadership, organization, and funding, RDT emphasizes perceived inequalities and frustrations as the driving forces behind movements.
1. Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT)
A. Definition and Key Ideas
- The Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) argues that social movements do not emerge only because of grievances but because activists have access to resources that allow them to organize.
- Resources can include money, media access, political support, leadership, and manpower.
- This theory suggests that even people who face injustice do not always protest unless they have the resources to do so.
B. Main Features of RMT
- Organized Leadership – Social movements succeed when they have strong leaders and structured organizations.
- Access to Resources – Funding, social networks, and media coverage play a crucial role in mobilizing people.
- Role of Political and Social Elites – Sometimes, social movements gain support from influential individuals, political parties, or NGOs, increasing their effectiveness.
- Rational Decision-Making – Movements are seen as strategic and well-planned actions, rather than spontaneous emotional reactions.
C. Examples of RMT in Social Movements
- Civil Rights Movement (USA, 1960s): Organizations like the NAACP and Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) used their resources, funding, and leadership (e.g., Martin Luther King Jr.) to mobilize protests and legal actions.
- India Against Corruption Movement (2011): Led by Anna Hazare, this movement gained momentum due to media attention, funding, and political alliances.
2. Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT)
A. Definition and Key Ideas
- The Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT) explains social movements as a response to perceived injustice and inequality.
- It suggests that people mobilize when they feel deprived compared to others, even if their absolute living conditions have not worsened.
- The frustration arising from economic, political, or social disparities motivates people to demand change.
B. Main Features of RDT
- Perceived Injustice – People compare themselves to more privileged groups and feel resentment.
- Expectation vs. Reality Gap – When people’s expectations for a better life are not met, they demand change.
- Emotional Trigger – Anger, frustration, and collective dissatisfaction push people into action.
- Spontaneous Uprising – Unlike RMT, which sees movements as strategic and planned, RDT argues that movements can be spontaneous.
C. Examples of RDT in Social Movements
- French Revolution (1789) – The common people (third estate) felt deprived compared to the privileged aristocracy, leading to revolution.
- Arab Spring (2011) – Widespread youth unemployment and political repression created a sense of deprivation, triggering mass protests across the Middle East.
- Dalit Movements in India – Dalits, historically oppressed, mobilized against caste-based discrimination when they saw others enjoying greater rights and privileges.
3. Key Differences Between RMT and RDT
| Feature | Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) | Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT) |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Availability of resources | Feelings of injustice and inequality |
| Movement Type | Organized, strategic, and planned | Emotional, spontaneous protests |
| Role of Leadership | Strong leadership is essential | No need for formal leadership |
| Example | Civil Rights Movement (USA) | Arab Spring (2011) |
4. Criticism of the Theories
A. Criticism of RMT
- Ignores the role of emotions and grievances in mobilizing people.
- Overemphasizes resources and leadership, ignoring grassroots movements that emerge without strong organization.
B. Criticism of RDT
- Does not explain why some deprived people do not protest, while others do.
- Movements often require resources, organization, and strategy, which RDT does not fully address.
5. Conclusion
Both Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) and Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT) offer valuable insights into why social movements arise. RMT highlights the importance of resources, organization, and leadership, whereas RDT focuses on grievances, frustration, and perceived inequalities.
While RDT explains why people feel the need for change, RMT explains how they actually organize to achieve that change. A combination of both theories is often needed to fully understand the success and failure of social movements.
For More Political Science Assignment Questions, Visit:
For more political science assignment questions visit
To search other questions, visit
To see the assignment questions, visit