Critically examine the theory of ‘deurbanisation’ in the post-Gupta period.

Answer

The theory of ‘deurbanisation’ describes a period in Indian history after the Gupta Empire (around 550 CE onwards), when many cities declined or disappeared. Historians use the term ‘deurbanisation’ to indicate that cities became smaller, trade reduced, and urban life weakened. Let’s examine this theory carefully to understand why historians believe it happened and whether this view fully explains the historical reality.

What is Deurbanisation?

Deurbanisation means the decline or disappearance of cities. After the Gupta period, many historians observed that large and prosperous cities began to shrink or completely disappeared. Trade became less active, marketplaces became smaller, and the economy became simpler, focusing mostly on agriculture in rural areas rather than city life.

Reasons Given for Deurbanisation:

Historians suggest various reasons why cities declined after the Gupta period:

1. Decline of Trade and Commerce:

During Gupta times, India had active international and domestic trade, which supported city life. After the Gupta Empire weakened, trade decreased significantly. Merchants traveled less, and trade routes became unsafe due to instability and conflicts.

Example:
Cities like Pataliputra and Taxila, once great trading centers, lost their importance due to reduced trade activities. This led to fewer economic opportunities and the eventual shrinking of these cities.

2. Political Instability and Wars:

After the Gupta Empire, India experienced political instability with many small kingdoms constantly fighting each other. These continuous wars disrupted urban life, trade, and agriculture, causing many cities to decline.

Example:
Frequent invasions and conflicts led people to move away from cities towards safer rural areas. Cities became vulnerable and less safe places to live.

3. Weakening of Urban Administration:

Strong central governments like the Guptas managed cities efficiently. After their decline, weak administration meant cities were poorly managed, leading to poor infrastructure, dirty streets, damaged drainage, and overall deterioration.

Example:
Lack of good governance meant urban infrastructure like roads, drainage, markets, and wells fell into disrepair, pushing people to abandon cities.

4. Decline of Crafts and Industries:

Urban areas thrived due to skilled craftsmen and industries like textiles, pottery, and metalworking. When trade reduced, craftspeople found fewer markets for their goods and moved to villages or smaller settlements to survive, contributing to the decline of cities.

Example:
Skilled workers left big cities, taking their craft skills to villages or smaller towns, leading to loss of urban economic strength.

Criticism of the Deurbanisation Theory:

While the theory of deurbanisation explains some changes clearly, historians also point out that it may be oversimplified. They argue:

  • Cities did not disappear completely:
    While many big cities declined, some continued as smaller but active towns. Some historians suggest that urban life simply shifted to smaller cities or different locations rather than completely ending.
  • Rise of New Urban Centers:
    Even though ancient cities declined, new cities and towns emerged in other regions. Thus, urban life continued in different forms, often shifting geographically.

Example:
Cities like Kanauj, Ujjain, and Thanjavur emerged or remained significant even after the Gupta period, showing that urban life continued differently.

  • Village Economy was Strong:
    Historians suggest the village economy became more powerful. Villages developed their own markets, crafts, and local trade, reducing dependence on big cities. This didn’t mean urban life totally vanished but rather adapted differently.

Conclusion:

The theory of deurbanisation explains clearly why many important cities declined after the Gupta period, mainly due to the decrease in trade, political instability, and weak administration. However, it doesn’t mean that urban life completely ended in India. Instead, urbanization transformed into new forms and places. Small towns and villages became stronger economically and socially, indicating that the reality of post-Gupta India was complex, with both urban decline and rural growth happening side-by-side.


For more political science assignment questions visit https://ignoucorner.com/ma-political-science/
To search other questions, visit https://ignoucorner.com/ignou-solved-assignments/
To see the assignment questions, visit https://webservices.ignou.ac.in/assignments/Master-Degree/MPS/2024-25/MPSE%202nd%20Year%20Year%202024-25%20(English)%20Assignment.pdf

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *