Best Answer: self assessment and peer assessment
Self assessment and peer assessment are two distinct evaluation methods in education, each with its own purpose, process, and benefits. Let’s explore the differences between them before developing a rubric for self-assessment of written tasks in a secondary-level subject.
Self-assessment:
Self-assessment involves students evaluating their own work, performance, or understanding of a particular task or concept. It is a reflective process where students critically analyze their strengths and weaknesses. Here are some key differences between self-assessment and peer assessment:
- Evaluator:
- In self-assessment, students assess their own work or performance.
- It is a form of introspection and self-reflection.
- Independence:
- Self-assessment is an individual process where students evaluate their work without external input.
- It promotes personal responsibility for learning and encourages metacognition.
- Feedback Source:
- Feedback in self-assessment comes from the student themselves.
- Students identify areas where they need improvement and set goals for self-improvement.
- Bias and Objectivity:
- Self-assessment may be influenced by bias or a lack of objectivity, as students may overestimate or underestimate their abilities.
- It requires guidance and practice to develop accurate self-assessment skills.
Peer assessment:
Peer assessment involves students evaluating the work, performance, or understanding of their peers. It is a collaborative process that can offer diverse perspectives and feedback. Here are some key differences:
- Evaluator:
- In peer assessment, students assess the work or performance of their peers.
- It encourages students to evaluate work from different perspectives.
- Collaboration:
- Peer assessment promotes collaboration and peer learning.
- Students learn from each other’s strengths and weaknesses, fostering a sense of community.
- Feedback Source:
- Feedback in peer assessment comes from fellow students.
- Students benefit from multiple viewpoints, potentially leading to more comprehensive feedback.
- Bias and Objectivity:
- Peer assessment can mitigate personal bias by involving multiple assessors.
- It can encourage objectivity as students evaluate work other than their own.
Rubric for Self-Assessment of Written Tasks in a Secondary-Level Subject:
Below is a sample rubric for self-assessment of written tasks in a secondary-level subject. This rubric is generic and can be adapted to various subjects, such as English, history, science, or mathematics. In this example, we’ll focus on an English essay:
| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Proficient (3) | Basic (2) | Limited (1) | Score (Out of 16) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | The essay demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject matter, with clear, well-developed ideas and insightful arguments. | The essay effectively conveys the intended message, with sound arguments and adequate supporting evidence. | The essay contains some relevant content but lacks depth or coherence in places. | The essay has minimal relevant content, and key points are unclear or missing. | /4 |
| Organization | The essay is exceptionally well-organized, with a logical flow of ideas, smooth transitions, and a strong introduction and conclusion. | The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Transitions are effective. | The essay has a basic structure but may lack some organization or coherence. | The essay lacks a clear organizational structure, making it difficult to follow. | /4 |
| Language and Style | The writing is sophisticated and engaging, demonstrating a high level of language proficiency. It effectively uses varied vocabulary, sentence structures, and rhetorical devices. | The writing is clear and competent, with appropriate vocabulary and style. | The writing is somewhat repetitive or lacks variety in language and style. | The writing is unclear, lacks appropriate vocabulary, or contains numerous errors. | /4 |
| Evidence and Support | The essay is well-supported with strong evidence, quotations, and examples that effectively reinforce arguments. | The essay provides adequate evidence and examples to support the arguments. | The essay contains some evidence but may lack depth or relevance. | The essay lacks sufficient evidence or uses inappropriate sources. | /4 |
| Mechanics and Conventions | The essay is virtually free from grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. | The essay has minor errors that do not significantly impact readability. | The essay contains noticeable errors that may occasionally impede understanding. | The essay is riddled with errors, making it difficult to comprehend. | /4 |
Total Score (out of 16): _
This rubric encourages students to assess their written work across various dimensions, including content, organization, language, evidence, and mechanics. It provides clear criteria for self-assessment and allows students to reflect on their strengths and areas needing improvement. By using such a rubric, students can take an active role in evaluating and enhancing their writing skills, promoting self-awareness and self-improvement in the learning process.
Happy Learning !! We hope you are liking our blogs , in case any suggestion or request please comment or Contact Us by Ask Question button on top right corner.
For More such question:
https://ignoucorner.com/assignments-programme-wise/