a) Characteristics of Military Regimes:
Military regimes, also known as military juntas or military dictatorships, represent a form of authoritarian government where the military holds a dominant and often repressive role in governing a country. They are characterized by several key features:
1. Seizure of Power: Military regimes typically come to power through a coup d’état or a forceful overthrow of the existing government. They often justify their actions as necessary for restoring order, stability, or addressing alleged corruption and mismanagement in civilian rule.
2. Suspension of Civilian Institutions: Once in power, military regimes frequently suspend or dissolve civilian institutions, such as the legislature and judiciary. This allows the military to consolidate its authority and govern without checks and balances.
3. Autocratic Leadership: Military regimes are usually led by high-ranking military officers who assume both political and executive control. These leaders often hold absolute power, concentrating authority in the hands of a few individuals.
4. Repression and Censorship: Military regimes are known for their repressive measures, including censorship of the media, suppression of political opposition, and curtailment of civil liberties. Political dissent and public protests are often met with force and repression.
5. Lack of Political Pluralism: Under military rule, political parties and opposition movements are often banned or severely restricted. Elections are either manipulated or not held at all, effectively eliminating political pluralism.
6. Economic Control: Military regimes may exert control over key sectors of the economy, including natural resources, industries, and trade. This control can lead to economic mismanagement, corruption, and a lack of transparency.
7. Nationalism and Patriotism: Military regimes often promote a sense of nationalism and patriotism as a way to legitimize their rule. This can include emphasizing national security and the need for a strong military to protect the country.
b) Maurice Duverger’s Classification of Party Systems:
Maurice Duverger, a French political scientist, made significant contributions to the study of political parties and electoral systems. He developed a classification of party systems, which categorizes countries based on the number of political parties and the nature of party competition. Duverger’s classification consists of several key types:
1. Single-Party System: In a single-party system, only one political party is legally allowed to exist and compete in elections. The ruling party typically monopolizes political power, and opposition parties are banned or marginalized.
2. Two-Party System: A two-party system features two major political parties that dominate the electoral landscape. These parties often alternate in power, and third parties face significant barriers to competing effectively.
3. Multi-Party System: In a multi-party system, several political parties compete for electoral support. No single party typically holds an absolute majority, and coalitions or alliances are common for forming governments.
4. Dominant-Party System: In a dominant-party system, while multiple parties exist, one party consistently dominates and remains in power for extended periods. Other parties may exist but have limited influence.
5. Multiparty System with Fragmented Parties: Some systems have numerous small, fragmented parties without clear dominant forces. These parties often have niche or regional focuses and may struggle to gain a significant presence in the national legislature.
Duverger’s classification is a valuable framework for understanding the dynamics of party competition and the nature of political systems in different countries. It helps scholars and analysts categorize and analyze party systems based on the number of parties, the level of competition, and the stability of the political landscape.
Refer Egyankosh ebook for more.