Introduction
The reservation in India is one of the most debated and impactful policies aimed at providing social justice and equal opportunities to historically disadvantaged communities. Introduced as an affirmative action measure, reservation provides scheduled castes (SCs), scheduled tribes (STs), and other backward classes (OBCs) with quotas in education, government jobs, and political representation.
However, while the system has helped uplift marginalized communities, it has also generated controversies over meritocracy, caste-based politics, and economic inclusion. This essay analyzes the politics of reservation in India, its historical background, key policies, and socio-political implications.
1. Historical Background of Reservation in India
The roots of the reservation system can be traced back to the pre-independence era, when British colonial policies and Indian social reformers advocated for affirmative action to uplift oppressed castes.
A. Early Efforts for Caste-Based Representation
- Jyotirao Phule (1870s) and Periyar (1920s) demanded education and jobs for lower castes.
- The British Government introduced communal reservations in 1902 in Maharashtra and later expanded them in the Government of India Act, 1935.
B. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Indian Constitution (Post-1947)
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, played a key role in including reservation for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in government jobs and education.
- The Constitution (Article 15 and Article 16) introduced affirmative action policies to uplift socially and educationally backward communities.
C. Mandal Commission and OBC Reservations (1990s)
- The Mandal Commission (1979) recommended 27% reservation for OBCs, which was implemented in 1990 by Prime Minister V.P. Singh.
- This led to widespread anti-reservation protests, with students and upper-caste communities opposing the policy.
2. Key Features of the Reservation System
- Scheduled Castes (SCs) – 15% reservation in government jobs, education, and legislatures.
- Scheduled Tribes (STs) – 7.5% reservation in public employment and higher education.
- Other Backward Classes (OBCs) – 27% reservation in government institutions (post-Mandal Commission).
- Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) – 10% reservation for financially weaker individuals from upper castes (introduced in 2019).
3. Politics of Reservation in India
A. Role of Political Parties in Caste-Based Mobilization
- Many political parties use caste identity as a tool to gain electoral support.
- Example: The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and Samajwadi Party (SP) in Uttar Pradesh primarily focus on Dalit and OBC empowerment.
B. Vote Bank Politics and Caste-Based Alliances
- Parties promise reservation benefits to specific caste groups in exchange for votes.
- Example: The Patidar agitation in Gujarat and the Jat protests in Haryana demanded OBC status for their communities.
C. Judicial Interventions and Reservation Cap (50% Limit)
- The Supreme Court, in the Indira Sawhney Case (1992), ruled that reservations cannot exceed 50%, ensuring a balance between merit and affirmative action.
- Despite this, states like Tamil Nadu (69% reservation) and Maharashtra (Maratha reservation) have challenged this limit.
4. Implications of the Reservation System
A. Positive Impact
- Social Empowerment of Marginalized Communities
- Reservation has provided better representation for Dalits, Adivasis, and backward classes in politics, education, and government jobs.
- Example: The rise of Dalit leaders like Mayawati (BSP) and OBC leaders like Lalu Prasad Yadav (RJD).
- Improved Access to Education and Employment
- Reservation policies have increased college enrollment rates among SCs, STs, and OBCs.
- Institutions like IITs and IIMs now admit more students from underprivileged backgrounds.
- Breaking Caste Barriers in Society
- By promoting social mobility, reservations have helped reduce historical caste discrimination.
- More SCs, STs, and OBCs now hold government and leadership positions.
B. Criticism and Challenges
- Merit vs. Affirmative Action Debate
- Critics argue that reservation reduces merit-based competition and affects the quality of professionals in administration and education.
- Example: Protests by upper-caste students against OBC reservations in medical colleges and civil services.
- Caste-Based Politics and Division
- Instead of eliminating caste divisions, reservation policies have sometimes deepened caste identities in politics.
- Some upper-caste communities feel left out, leading to agitations for reservation (e.g., Patidars, Marathas, Jats).
- Dominance of “Creamy Layer” in OBC Reservations
- In the Indira Sawhney case (1992), the Supreme Court introduced the concept of “creamy layer” (wealthier OBCs) who are excluded from reservations.
- However, many powerful OBC groups still dominate the benefits, leaving the truly needy behind.
- Economic Backwardness Not Considered Initially
- The original reservation system only focused on caste-based discrimination, ignoring economically weak upper castes.
- The 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in 2019 was introduced to correct this imbalance.
5. Future of Reservation in India
- Expanding Economic-Based Affirmative Action: A merit-caste balance should be achieved by giving weightage to both caste and economic status.
- Need for Periodic Review: Reservation policies should be reviewed every 10 years to ensure they benefit those who truly need them.
- Strengthening Education and Skill Development: Instead of relying only on reservation, the government should provide quality education and skill training to uplift marginalized communities.
- Encouraging Private Sector Inclusion: Currently, reservations apply only to government jobs and institutions. There are debates on extending affirmative action to the private sector.
6. Conclusion
The reservation system in India is a crucial tool for social justice, empowerment, and representation of historically disadvantaged groups. While it has helped uplift SCs, STs, and OBCs, it has also led to political polarization and debates over meritocracy.
A balanced approach is needed—one that protects the rights of marginalized groups while also ensuring merit-based opportunities for all. The future of reservation should focus on economic inclusion, education, and social mobility rather than just caste-based quotas.
For More Political Science Assignment Questions, Visit:
For more political science assignment questions visit
To search other questions, visit
To see the assignment questions, visit