Sri Aurobindo (1872–1950) was a key figure in India’s freedom struggle, known for his intellectual, nationalist, and spiritual contributions. In the early stages of his political life, he was actively involved in criticizing the “moderate” faction of the Indian National Congress. These moderates believed in petitioning the British rulers for gradual reforms and argued that patient negotiation would eventually bring self-governance to India. Sri Aurobindo, however, found this approach too timid and believed that a more forceful stance was necessary. His critique of the moderates shaped a new wave of nationalism that emphasized self-reliance, cultural pride, and complete independence.
Introduction
Sri Aurobindo began his political journey during a period when the Indian National Congress was dominated by moderate leaders. Influenced by Western education but also deeply rooted in Indian culture, he came to see the limitations of the moderate approach. In his view, the moderates failed to inspire the masses or challenge the British Empire directly. Instead, they relied heavily on petitions, speeches, and requests for small administrative changes. Sri Aurobindo wanted a bolder form of politics that demanded full autonomy—Swaraj—rather than slow constitutional reforms.
The Moderates in the Early Indian National Congress
Moderate leaders like Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, and Pherozeshah Mehta believed that British rule could be improved from within. They trusted in the British sense of justice and hoped to gradually secure larger political rights for Indians. Their methods included:
- Writing petitions and memorandums to British officials.
- Holding annual Congress sessions where grievances were discussed.
- Building public opinion among the educated elite in India and Britain.
While these approaches had some success—raising awareness of Indian issues and uniting politically conscious Indians—they largely failed to mobilize the broader population. The British government also dismissed many of the petitions or offered minimal concessions.
Key Criticisms from Sri Aurobindo
Sri Aurobindo emerged as one of the voices calling for a more vigorous strategy. His criticisms were rooted in the belief that the moderates’ methods were too passive. Key points of his critique include:
- Demand for Complete Independence
Sri Aurobindo argued that India deserved Swaraj—full freedom—rather than simple administrative reforms. He found it unacceptable that the moderates were satisfied with small changes, such as a few more Indian members in legislative councils. - Mass Mobilization and National Consciousness
He felt that the moderates’ top-down approach did not resonate with ordinary people. In his writings and speeches, Sri Aurobindo urged leaders to inspire the masses with ideas of national pride and unity, rather than appealing solely to British goodwill. - Assertion of Self-Reliance
Sri Aurobindo believed that Indians should rely on their own resources, culture, and spirituality. The moderate stance seemed too dependent on the approval and support of British officials. In contrast, he promoted boycott movements and the revival of Indian education, language, and industry. - Spiritual and Cultural Roots
Aurobindo saw India not just as a political entity but as a rich civilization with deep cultural and spiritual heritage. He encouraged Indians to rediscover their spiritual strength as part of a robust nationalism that the British could not easily dismiss.
Shift from Moderation to Extremism
Sri Aurobindo, along with other leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal, came to be known as the “extremists” or “nationalists.” They preferred:
- Direct Action: Boycotting British goods, promoting Swadeshi (use of Indian-made products), and resisting unfair colonial policies.
- Political Agitation: Organizing rallies, newspapers, and networks to spread nationalist ideas and unify people in the freedom struggle.
- Mass Participation: Involving students, workers, and peasants, thereby expanding the base of the Congress beyond the elite class.
This new wave of politics pushed the Indian National Congress to become more assertive. While moderates still had influence, the emergence of extremism signaled a turning point, intensifying demands for complete independence.
Legacy and Conclusion
Sri Aurobindo’s critique of the political moderates laid the groundwork for a more dynamic and wide-reaching freedom movement. His call for Swaraj, self-reliance, and cultural pride influenced many later leaders, including Mahatma Gandhi and Subhas Chandra Bose, though they each had unique strategies. As the struggle continued, the Congress itself evolved, sometimes combining moderate and radical tactics.
Over time, the nationalist movement drew more heavily on mass-based campaigns, aligning with Sri Aurobindo’s vision of uniting a broader segment of society. Although he eventually withdrew from active politics to focus on spiritual pursuits in Pondicherry, his political writings and critiques lived on. They helped shape an India that sought not just minor reforms but complete liberation from colonial rule.
Sri Aurobindo’s critique of the moderates was, at its core, a call for Indians to trust in their own strength and cultural identity. By insisting on direct, vigorous methods and an unbreakable belief in national selfhood, he helped pave the way for a bolder and more inclusive independence movement that would eventually secure India’s freedom in 1947.
For more political science assignment questions, visit https://ignoucorner.com/ma-political-science/
To search other questions, visit https://ignoucorner.com/ignou-solved-assignments/
To see the assignment questions, visit https://webservices.ignou.ac.in/assignments/Master-Degree/MPS/2024-25/MPSE%202nd%20Year%20Year%202024-25%20(English)%20Assignment.pdf